In this post I want to illustrate a simple technique for making curriculum objectives more realistic and consistent throughout a scope and sequence.
I’ve worked on updating and aligning a number of ESL curricula, for the purposes of aligning to the CEFR or adult Ed standards, as well as accreditation through CEA or ACCET.
Let’s take a look at this mini scope and sequence as example of how Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) are often presented:
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | |
| Reading | SWBAT blah blah blah | SWBAT blah blah blah | SWBAT blah blah blah | SWBAT blah blah blah |
| Writing | SWBAT write simple and compound sentences. | SWBAT write a paragraph with topic sentences and supporting details. | SWBAT paraphrase and properly cite sources in essays. | SWBAT use a range of vocabulary and sentence constructions to control style and register. |
| Speaking | SWBAT blah blah blah | SWBAT blah blah blah | SWBAT blah blah blah | SWBAT blah blah blah |
Quite often a narrow sub-skill or strategy appears in the scope and sequence as though they are confined to a single level or course. For instance, in the table above, it appears that the skill of
